NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 248, 248(1), 248(4), 252(3), 455 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013

 

 

 

 

NAME

MOBILE NO.

E-MAIL I’D

RANJEET KUMAR

83830984789667769795

rk@courtkutchehry.com

JAI THAKUR

81307033349355723300

jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com

RAJEEV RANJAN

9334553249

rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com

ASHOK MISHRA

9718327746

sales@courtkutchehry.com

RAVI KUMAR


ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com

Shila Builders And Developers Private Limited Vs. Registrar Of Companies Nct Of Delhi And Haryana And Ors, (2020) 07 NCLT CK 0032

NCLT allowed the appeal filed by the applicant, under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of the name of the struck off company. While allowing the application NCLT held that it has been in operation since incorporation and during the period preceding strike off, therefore it could not be termed as a defunct company as per section 252 of the Act. Thus, taking into consideration the provisions of Section 252(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 which vests this Tribunal with a discretion where the Company, whose name has been struck off, and such Company is able to demonstrate that there is a running business as on the date when the name was struck off and also keeping in consideration that it is just to do so, can restore the name of the Company, in the Register and in the interest of all stakeholders, including the Appellant itself, who seeks restoration of the name of the Company in the register.

Comments